Poland has the ingredients to build a strong startup economy, but do its entrepreneurs lack ambition?
By Ben
Rooney
WARSAW—With its population of about 38 million people, you could
describe Poland as the smallest large European state. Spain ranks just above it
with 46 million citizens, and Romania is on the rung below, with 21 million.
This may explain why Poland's startup community has yet to make an
impact on the European scene. According to Tomasz Czechowicz, Managing Partner
of MCI Management SA, one of Poland's leading venture
capital and private equity companies, the problem is that the population is
just about big enough to support a reasonable-sized local company, and this
dulls ambition.
"Most of the products we see are focused on being a national
champion," he said. "Not on being regional champions, not on European
champions, not on global champions. Too many products are addressing the Polish
market only."
Smaller countries have no choice but to think globally from the
start. Tiny Estonia—with a population of around 1.3 million—has produced a raft
of global startups, such as design software company GrabCAD Inc and retail
software provider Erply Ltd. Larger countries can support sizable local
companies and then take them international, as Berlin-based Rocket Internet
GmbH has proved with companies like its fashion retailer Zalando GmbH, with its
€1.15 billion ($1.47 billion) revenue in 2012. It is the countries in the
middle—too small to be big, too big to be small—that are caught.
Poland has the ingredients to build a strong startup economy.
According to Radosław Czyrko, managing partner of Xevin Investments Sp. z o.o.,
a Warsaw-based venture capital firm specializing in seed and early stage
funding, "We are a very entrepreneurial country. I saw a report that said
27% of adult people want to open their own company in the next three
years."
Poland has also traditionally possessed engineering talent, said
Arek Skuza, CEO of iTraff Technology Sp. z o.o., a Poznań-based startup working
on photo recognition for mobile devices. "Having Polish engineers gives us
a label in the U.S. that we can build things, that we have great skills."
The lack of computers under the Communists helped. "Students
had to write their programs out on paper," Mr. Skuza said. "That
meant people had to learn well because there was no way of testing it."
The country also has money, much of it from the European Union. In
2011 Poland attracted €14.4 billion in EU funds—some 4.08% of GDP—and over the
next seven years Poland will be the biggest beneficiary among all member
states. As a result, said Kasia Godlewska, founder of Absolvent Sp. z o.o., a
job service, getting seed money isn't hard. "There is a lot of money, most
of it comes from Europe."
The problem, according to a number of entrepreneurs, comes in
later funding rounds. Michał Brański, co-founder of Grupa o2 Sp. z o.o., an
online media site, and himself an angel investor, agreed. "One of the
stronger pain points in the Polish startup scene is getting to Round A. Getting
seed funding is easy, but most of the angels and seed investors fund only a
short runway, they give funds to develop the technology, but they lie to
themselves that the business will develop by themselves. It is not true. That
is why most Polish startups struggle after a half year."
But Mr. Czechowicz, of MCI Management, refuted this suggestion.
"There are about 20 early-stage funds that can do Round A funding,"
he said. "[There are] about three to five funds that can do Round B. That
is about one billion Zlotys [$295.6 million] for the growth financing and
venture capital financing at the moment."
Instead, he laid the blame firmly at the feet of a lack of
ambition among Polish entrepreneurs. "With a national champion you can get
an exit of only about €10-20 million. With this kind of valuation you can only
do one or two rounds maximum." To raise bigger rounds, companies need to
address bigger markets to attract bigger valuations. He said startups should
aim to be at least regional players, using Poland's links across central
Europe.
Everyone agrees on the need for time. It is easy to forget,
looking at the high-rise buildings that are growing across Warsaw's skyline, or
the number of 4x4s that drive down the wide boulevards, that the country has
barely had a single generation as a market economy.
Entrepreneurs rattle off a list of problems: highly bureaucratic,
setting up a company takes too long, labor inflexibility, lack of experienced
business mentors, a lack of business acumen, an education system that doesn't support
entrepreneurialism.
But in the same breath, all agreed on how fast things were
changing; whereas once it took months to start a company, now it was weeks,
smarter investors who understand venture funding are appearing on the scene,
and there are increasing number of venture-capital firms.
What worries some is the country's dependence on European funds.
With funding secured for at least another seven years, that has bought the
country time. Marcin Zaborowski, the director of Poland's Institute of International
Affairs, said this should be used to support innovation.
"In the new [financial] perspective, a greater emphasis
should be put on innovativeness. The government should pay much attention to
this matter," he told the Polish Press Agency earlier this year.
This is a repost of an article by Ben Rooney, the Tech
editor of the Wall Street Journal European edition.
No comments:
Post a Comment